SKILLEMALL.ai

AC tech-scout

Daily multi-source intelligence digest that proactively scans X, YouTube, Reddit, and GitHub for tools, techniques, and updates relevant to your active projects — delivered before your morning session. Filters high-signal from noise using a 7/10 quality bar. Each surfaced item includes a "why this matters for you" note. Use when you want your agent to stay on top of fast-moving AI, crypto, content creation, or technical domains without you doing manual research.

ClawHub Hermes author: pingukim225 v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 406 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ReferenceYouTubeGitHubInfrastructureMedia and videoAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

  1. For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-long-hermes description is 467 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period)
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "emoji"

Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Steps. 35 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1406 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 466: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill appears to perform a disclosed research-and-digest workflow, with local history files that users should treat as a record of their interests.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026