SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AC scenario-planning

Perform project management what-if (scenario) analysis to simulate risks, delays, and resource changes. Use when planning schedules, assessing uncertainty, or evaluating project impacts in tools like Excel, MS Project, or Primavera.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: pkacker v1.0.2 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 807 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 22 h ago

Perform project management what-if (scenario) analysis to simulate risks, delays, and resource changes.

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerData and analyticsOperations and projectsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 85Steps. 61 steps, 2 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 807 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 232: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 19 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 61 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is an instruction-only project planning skill for what-if analysis, with no code execution, credential use, persistence, or hidden behavior found.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026