AC host-hardening
Harden an OpenClaw Linux server with SSH key-only auth, UFW firewall, fail2ban brute-force protection, and credential permissions. Use when setting up a new OpenClaw instance, auditing server security, or after a security incident. Requires root/sudo on Linux (Ubuntu/Debian).
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-background-processSKILL.md:45Starts a background / autostarted process (documentation of a security skill)systemctl enable --now fail2ban
security skill -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-background-processSKILL.md:77Starts a background / autostarted process (documentation of a security skill)systemctl daemon-reload && systemctl enable openclaw-gateway
security skill
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 7 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 723 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 276: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.