SKILLEMALL.ai

BC xiaozhi-learning-dna

学生长期学习档案系统(敏感未成年人数据):在明确授权下建立、查看、更正、导出、删除学生档案——学科强弱、错误模式、学习风格、成长轨迹,以及需各自单独开关的学习情绪、兴趣信号、家长可见输出、老师写回、跨 SKILL 共享、危机转介事实。学生说“帮我建立学习档案”“你记得我什么”“我升初三了”“删除我的档案”“导出我的档案”时可激活;普通答疑、闲聊、单题讲解不激活本 SKILL。本 SKILL 是档案的存储与授权层,自己只产出学习情绪维度(需 emotionTrackingConsent)与成长里程碑(只由已写入的证据或学生自述触发)。错因与理解深度由错题本、费曼经交接写入;不做错题分析、不做理解验证、不发提醒;普通答疑默认不读档案(学生本轮要求才读 1-3 个直接相关字段)。所有开关默认关闭;未获同意只用当前会话信息;约 14 周岁以下需监护人同意;说话人未确认时受限:不读不写不改授权。

ClawHub Hermes author: 小智伴学 v2.1.12 MIT-0 18 files body ≈ 5 643 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
61
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
  3. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 18. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-long-hermes description is 398 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period)
  • warning description-no-when neither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5643 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_name"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "grade_bands"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"

Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5643 tokens
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 61 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -213 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 398: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 46 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 61 items
  • +4Has examples (26 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 61.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a clearly disclosed student learning-profile system, but it needs review because it handles sensitive minors' data and has inconsistent or under-enforced boundaries for crisis records and teacher writeback.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 7 Sept 2026