SKILLEMALL.ai

BD distillation-adversarial-verify

跨模型蒸馏工程化的对抗验证环:对蒸馏出的关键决策规则 / 学生技能做反例测试,量化"学到了真能力 还是只学到表面话术"。给定一组规则(可调用函数或规则 dict)与对抗用例集,输出每条规则的健壮性 评分与整体蒸馏质量分,并标记需回炉的规则。纯标准库、零依赖、可本地实跑(--selftest 自带样例)。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: qq435912743 v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 521 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

跨模型蒸馏工程化的对抗验证环:对蒸馏出的关键决策规则 / 学生技能做反例测试,量化"学到了真能力 还是只学到表面话术"。给定一组规则(可调用函数或规则 dict)与对抗用例集,输出每条规则的健壮性 评分与整体蒸馏质量分,并标记需回炉的规则。纯标准库、零依赖、可本地实跑(--selftest 自带样例)。

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "visibility"

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 15 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 521 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 152: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill mostly performs local adversarial rule testing, but it also silently executes target-skill Python code and includes a broad persistent learning/memory subsystem that is not well scoped to that purpose.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 14 Aug 2026