SKILLEMALL.ai

AC self-eval

自我评估 / rubric 评分器(元认知闭环核心)。让 agent 对自己的输出做结构化、可复现的评分,而非凭感觉"我觉得不错"。提供多维度评分表(相关性/完整性/结构/准确性/可执行性)、自动 rubric 生成、可选参考答案重叠比对,输出打分 JSON + 改进建议。当用户需要"评估一下这段输出""给自己的回答打分""做个 rubric 评分""self-evaluation""检查质量"时调用。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: qq435912743 v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 355 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 36 h ago

自我评估 / rubric 评分器(元认知闭环核心)。让 agent 对自己的输出做结构化、可复现的评分,而非凭感觉"我觉得不错"。提供多维度评分表(相关性/完整性/结构/准确性/可执行性)、自动 rubric 生成、可选参考答案重叠比对,输出打分 JSON +…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "visibility"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 14 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 355 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 203: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is an offline self-evaluation scorer with optional local report and learning files, and the persistence is disclosed and user-invoked.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 14 Aug 2026