SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AB what-changed

Part of the Overpowered skill suite. Explain material semantic differences between versions or snapshots and assess why they matter. Use for policies, procedures, contracts, requirements, datasets, configurations, APIs, schemas, reports, or other evolving artifacts when the user cares about impact rather than a raw line diff.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: raguets v1.0.1 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 473 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Part of the Overpowered skill suite.

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, running it twice

AnalyzerData and analyticsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 24 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 473 tokens
    • medium 3 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 327: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill provides bounded guidance for explaining meaningful changes between user-provided versions and does not request unusual access or background behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 3 Sept 2026