SKILLEMALL.ai

AD amazon-rating-analysis

亚马逊星级评分分析 Skill:拆解一个 ASIN 的评分结构——各星级占比、评分随时间的变化、 差评集中在哪个时间段,判断是批次问题还是长期硬伤,辅助定位评分下滑的原因。 Use when the user asks about star rating breakdown, rating distribution, review score analysis, 星级分析、评分分析、评分分布、评分下滑、星级占比、 评分诊断。Requires an ARI API key (ari_live_*).

ClawHub Agent Skills v1.4.7 9 files body ≈ 2 341 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
45/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: amazon-rating-analysis (ClawHub)

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Exfiltration medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".

For the author

If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • medium Exfiltration net-redirectable-api-key scripts/ari.py:61
      Helper sends the API key to a host configured by an environment variable — the key can be redirected to another server
      API key + configurable base URL from environment

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_name"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (amazon-rating-analysis) differs from the folder (rating-analysis)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 69 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2341 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 251: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 69 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This appears to be a real ARI Amazon review tool, but it has broader billing, monitoring, export, and account-management powers than the rating-analysis listing clearly suggests.
    LLM: suspicious (high)