A forge-python-dev
Python development agent — automation scripts, API wrappers, CLI tools, data pipelines, web scrapers. Tested code with error handling and docs. Use when you need working Python code, API integrations, data processing, or CLI utilities.
A
92/100
Overall score
- Safety 60%
- Quality 40%
- Tests bonus
How to improve
- Add evals/evals.json with 4–6 real requests and expected answers: the full check will then use your cases instead of a model draft.
- Add a spec.yaml with triggers and assertions (skilltest init): the behaviour contract for CI.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Lint
✓ Lint: no remarks
Process maturity 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 4 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 345 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 235: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 4 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This markdown-only skill is not malicious, but it routes Python coding work to a paid external agent flow without clear confirmation, spending, or data-sharing boundaries.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026