SKILLEMALL.ai

AB task-resume

Automatic interrupted-task resume workflow with queueing and recovery. Use when a user asks to resume interrupted work after temporary context switches, protect priority tasks from drift, or enforce "finish current task then auto-resume previous interrupted task" behavior.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: RichardSun v1.3.0 4 files body ≈ 1 046 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
When it triggers w 12
20
Inputs and preconditions w 11
30
Result and completion w 14
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 70Failures and branches. 5 branches
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 32 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1046 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 273: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This is a legitimate task-continuity skill, but it persistently stores cross-session task context and includes under-scoped automatic resume, watchdog, and log-recovery behavior that users should review before installing.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026