SKILLEMALL.ai

AB lidar-point-cloud-analysis

Read LAS/LAZ/COPC point clouds, compute statistics, classification QA, DEM/DSM/CHM rasters, cross-sections, density maps, and quality reports. Use when analyzing LiDAR point cloud data, generating terrain models, checking point cloud quality, or producing canopy height models.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ruiduobao v3.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 304 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 29 h ago

Read LAS/LAZ/COPC point clouds, compute statistics, classification QA, DEM/DSM/CHM rasters, cross-sections, density maps, and quality reports.

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: failures and branches, consistency, running it twice

AnalyzerSoftware developmentData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (lidar-point-cloud-analysis) differs from the folder (geoskill-lidar-point-cloud-analysis)
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 85Steps. 14 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1304 tokens
    • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 277: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a coherent local LiDAR analysis skill, with dependency and output-overwrite cautions but no hidden network use, persistence, or destructive behavior found.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 31 Jul 2026