AC pharma-analyst
Produce current, evidence-graded pharmaceutical and biotechnology analysis at the company, platform, pipeline, asset, indication, trial, competitive-landscape, catalyst, risk, and valuation levels. Use for biopharma diligence, investment-research-style reports, pipeline reviews, target or mechanism assessments, clinical-data interpretation, competitor comparisons, deal or financing analysis, catalyst calendars, risk-adjusted valuation, and updates to an existing pharma report or PDF. Supports public and private companies and preclinical through commercial-stage assets. Do not use for patient-specific medical advice.
Produce current, evidence-graded pharmaceutical and biotechnology analysis at the company, platform, pipeline, asset, indication, trial…
As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 85Steps. 52 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2176 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 623: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 52 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.