SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

DD clawrtc-pip

(no description)

Not recommendedlow grade D
ClawHub Agent Skills author: AutoJanitor v1.5.0 15 files body ≈ 806 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
D
43/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
71
Quality 40%
0
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Dangerous commands medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.

For the author

Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.

How to improve

  1. Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 9

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 9
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-persistence clawrtc/cli.py:449
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (string literal in code, not executed)
    run_cmd(f'launchctl load "{plist_file}"')
    code literal
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-persistence clawrtc/cli.py:478
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (string literal in code, not executed)
    pf = os.path.expanduser("~/Library/LaunchAgents/com.clawrtc.miner.plist")
    code literal
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-persistence clawrtc/cli.py:480
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (string literal in code, not executed)
    run_cmd(f'launchctl load "{pf}"', check=False)
    code literal
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-persistence clawrtc/cli.py:504
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (string literal in code, not executed)
    pf = os.path.expanduser("~/Library/LaunchAgents/com.clawrtc.miner.plist")
    code literal
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-persistence clawrtc/cli.py:768
    Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (string literal in code, not executed)
    pf = os.path.expanduser("~/Library/LaunchAgents/com.clawrtc.miner.plist")
    code literal
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token clawrtc/coinbase_wallet.py:24
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    "wrtc_contract": "0x56…9c6",
    quoted
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token clawrtc/coinbase_wallet.py:25
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    "usdc_contract": "0x83…913",
    quoted
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token clawrtc/coinbase_wallet.py:26
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    "aerodrome_pool": "0x4C…A3F",
    quoted
  • low Secrets in code secret-private-key clawrtc/coinbase_wallet.py:78
    Private key material (placeholder value)
    export CDP_API_KEY_PRIVATE_KEY="-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- …
    placeholder

Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error frontmatter SKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found
  • error name-missing SKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name`
  • error description-missing SKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 26 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 806 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly matches its stated crypto-mining purpose, but it sends device identifiers like MAC addresses and hostname despite telling users that personal data is not sent.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 19 May 2026