AC git-discipline
Apply safe git workflow rules for the current local repository: branches, commits, staging, and history handling. Use when the user asks to inspect git state, create branches, prepare commits, review staged changes, or manage history without risking unrelated work. Do not use for GitHub API operations, PR review workflows, or remote repository administration. Chinese triggers: Git 规范、分支命名、提交信息、提交前检查、安全提交、不改公共历史.
As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Apply safe git workflow rules for the current local repository: br… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 12 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 77 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 415: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 3 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.