BC workshop-miro
Workshop photos/notes -> an editable Miro diagram (real FRAMES as containers + stickies + connectors) with idempotent dedupe, rollback, undo and change commands, using the local script miro-push.mjs and env vars.
As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (workshop-miro) differs from the folder (miro-workshop-assistant)
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Failures and branches. 6 branches
- 100Steps. 83 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1658 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 212: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 18 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 83 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is coherent for pushing workshop diagrams to Miro, but it can modify or delete live board content with too little confirmation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026