CC monolith
Secure crypto wallet for AI agents. Hardware-isolated keys (Apple Secure Enclave), ERC-4337 smart wallet, on-chain spending caps, default-deny policy engine.
As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 13
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 13
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-persistencelib/runtime-bootstrap.js:9Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (string literal in code, not executed)`${process.env.HOME}/Library/LaunchAgents/com.monolith.daemon.plist`,code literal -
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-persistencelib/runtime-bootstrap.js:10Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (string literal in code, not executed)'/Library/LaunchAgents/com.monolith.daemon.plist',
code literal -
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-persistencelib/runtime-bootstrap.js:28Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (string literal in code, not executed)commands.push(`/bin/launchctl bootstrap ${domain} ${shellQuote(launchAgentPath)}`);code literal -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenlib/constants.js:20High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)'0xA0…B48': { symbol: 'USDC', decimals: 6 },quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenlib/constants.js:23High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)'0x83…913': { symbol: 'USDC', decimals: 6 },quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenlib/constants.js:28High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)export const ENTRY_POINT = '0x00…032';
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenlib/constants.js:32High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)UNIVERSAL_ROUTER: '0x3f…FAD',
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenlib/constants.js:34High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)1: '0x61…21e',
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenlib/intent-builder.js:89High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)1: '0xA0…B48',
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenlib/intent-builder.js:90High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)8453: '0x83…913',
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:23High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…p81+8Ob3…L40/b0i7…gQw==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:85High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha512-+lF0B…kdX+94aG…d8c+B3KT…U6A==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:200High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…CzX+oOPq…N14+GARU…vzg==",
detector
Files scanned: 23. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source"
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 36 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1137 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- -312 of 12 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 157: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.