BD optimized-one-click-project
全自动项目生成和启动器 - 生成完整的Spring Boot + Vue3项目，包含前后端完整代码（RBAC+业务实体）、数据库初始化、编译启动、自动浏览器打开。支持完整CRUD（列表、查询、新增、修改、删除、查看）、多条件查询、状态下拉枚举、Redis配置、Swagger文档，使用JSON配置文件自定义参数。
As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-eval-dynamicscripts/optimized-start-win.py:2433Dynamic code execution from decoded/untrusted inputos.system(f'start "" "{bat_path}"') -
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-eval-dynamicscripts/optimized-start-win.py:2457Dynamic code execution from decoded/untrusted inputos.system(f'start "" "{bat_path}"') -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/optimized-start-win.py:1059High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)Gene…zer jsonSerializer = new Gene…zer();
quoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/optimized-start-win.py:1074High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded).serializeValuesWith(RedisSerializationContext.SerializationPair.fromSerializer(new Gene…zer()))
quoted
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 47 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2467 tokens
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- -253 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 156: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 30 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 47 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.