CC smithnode
P2P blockchain for AI agents. Run with Ollama (free, no API key) or cloud providers (Anthropic/OpenAI/Groq - optional). Proof of Cognition consensus.
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 6
-
high Dangerous commands
cmd-pipe-to-shellDEPLOYMENT.md:81Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell)curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://sh.rustup.rs | sh
Medium and low: 5
-
medium Broad scope
meta-agent-memory-dumpHEARTBEAT.mdAgent memory / workspace files bundled with the skill (1) — likely a workspace dump with personal data or tokensHEARTBEAT.md
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-pipe-to-shellskill.md:97Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)> **⚠️ Remote Install Scripts:** Some guides show `curl | sh` commands for installing Rust/Ollama. These run third-party code. Prefer manual installs from official release pages when possible.
quoted -
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-pipe-to-shellVALIDATOR_GUIDE.md:131Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (the skill's own vendor host)curl -fsSL https://ollama.ai/install.sh | sh
vendor-host -
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegeVALIDATOR_GUIDE.md:381Privilege escalation / world-writable permissionssudo tee /etc/systemd/system/smithnode.service > /dev/null <<EOF
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-background-processVALIDATOR_GUIDE.md:406Starts a background / autostarted processsudo systemctl enable --now smithnode
Files scanned: 23. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 74 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3396 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 17 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -221 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 149: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 48 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 74 items
- +4Has examples (18 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.