SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AB document-diff

Compare two documents (PDF, Word, images, PPT) and generate a structured diff report highlighting what changed, what was added, and what was removed. Uses SoMark to parse both documents first for accurate structure-aware comparison. Requires SoMark API Key (SOMARK_API_KEY).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Soul-Code v0.1.2 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 2 035 tokens open source ↗ analyzed 34 h ago

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

GeneratorData and analyticsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Lint

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning spec-missing no spec.yaml: behaviour contract not defined (run `skilltest init`)
  • warning triggers-missing spec.yaml has no triggers.positive: skill triggering is not tested
  • warning evals-missing no evals/evals.json: behaviour is not tested (run `skilltest init`)

Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 31 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 7 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2035 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 274: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill does what it says: it compares two user-selected documents by sending them to SoMark for parsing and writing local diff reports.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026