AC clawguard-security-checker
ClawGuard Security Checker v3 - Advanced configuration analysis, runtime integrity verification, permission modeling, and one-click hardening recommendations
As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (clawguard-security-checker) differs from the folder (clawguard-checker)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 35 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3747 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -224 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 157: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 34 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a legitimate local OpenClaw security checker, but it asks agents to inspect sensitive files and even optional process memory without tight scope or clear consent safeguards.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026