SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AC fb-repost

Skill để lấy nội dung từ link bài viết Facebook, viết lại bài theo phong cách phù hợp, tạo ảnh minh họa bằng Gemini, rồi đăng lên Facebook Page qua Graph API. KÍCH HOẠT khi user đưa link Facebook và muốn repost, đăng lại, viết lại bài, hay nói "lấy bài này đăng lên page". Dùng skill này BẤT CỨ KHI NÀO có link FB + yêu cầu đăng bài.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: techlaai v1.0.0 6 files body ≈ 798 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Secrets in code secret-password-literal scripts/generate_image.py:13
    Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example)
    API_KEY = sys.argv[2] if len(sys.argv) > 2 else None

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (fb-repost) differs from the folder (techla-fb-repost)
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 23 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 798 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 336: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 3 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill does what it claims, but it handles Facebook Page posting credentials in ways that deserve careful review before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026