SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AB codebase-guide

Use for every task involving this project. Covers running Ganglion, its CLI commands, HTTP bridge API, pipeline execution, knowledge queries, configuration, and operational workflows. Trigger phrases: 'run the pipeline', 'start the server', 'check status', 'query knowledge', 'configure', 'call the API', 'scaffold a project', 'check metrics', 'rollback', 'swap policy'.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: tensorlink-dev v1.0.0 9 files · 1 script body ≈ 2 092 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
Failures and branches w 10
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-eval-dynamic references/troubleshooting.md:264
      Dynamic code execution from decoded/untrusted input (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      python3 -c "exec(open('./my-subnet/tools/problem_file.py').read())"
      quoted

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 20 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2092 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 370: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This appears to be a legitimate Ganglion operator guide, but it is always-on and includes powerful commands for uploading code, changing agent behavior, and rolling back project state without enough guardrails.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026