SKILLEMALL.ai

BC multi-research-free

多视角投研分析-基本面/技术面/新闻/风险辩论。针对A股领域的专业AI辅助工具,\n,去除原始风险代码,增强安全性和稳定性,\n补充完整的错误处理与边界情况,增加多场景使用示例。\n\。Use when 用户需要多视角投研分析相关功能时使用。不适用于超出本技能能力范围的复杂需求。适用于独立开发者、企业团队和自动化工作流场景。 功能涵盖: multi, research。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 天轰穿 v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 075 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 36 h ago

多视角投研分析-基本面/技术面/新闻/风险辩论。针对A股领域的专业AI辅助工具,\n,去除原始风险代码,增强安全性和稳定性,\n补充完整的错误处理与边界情况,增加多场景使用示例。\n\。Use when…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationSoftware developmentData and analyticsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Invalid escape sequence \。 at line 6, column 106: …增强安全性和稳定性,\n补充完整的错误处理与边界情况,增加多场景使用示例。\n\。Use when 用户需要多视角投研分析相关功能时使用。不适用于超出本技能… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 89 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2075 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 186: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 47 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 89 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is a finance-analysis prompt package that asks for broad agent tools and API-key use while making unsupported claims about security controls and investment-analysis capability.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · 14 Aug 2026