SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

BB halaos-hr-copilot

AI HR Copilot for Southeast Asia. Works with HalaOS MCP Server for live data (employees, attendance, leave, payroll, compliance, org intelligence) or standalone with built-in PH/SG/LK labor law knowledge. Your HR department in a conversation.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: tonypk v2.1.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 2 440 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ReferenceAI and agentsSecurityFinancetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
When it triggers w 12
20
Inputs and preconditions w 11
30
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "emoji"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Failures and branches. 4 branches
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 67 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2440 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 242: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 21 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 67 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a plausible HR copilot, but it can expose or change sensitive employee, payroll, leave, attendance, and workforce-risk data from broad natural-language prompts with limited safety controls described.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026