BC crypto-market-analyzer
Fetch real-time crypto prices and calculate technical indicators (SMA, EMA, MACD, RSI, Bollinger Bands, ATR) for BTC, ETH, SOL, BNB, XRP, DOGE. Powered by multi-source data (Binance, CoinGecko, CoinCap, CryptoCompare).
As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, consistency, running it twice
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "requires"
Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (crypto-market-analyzer) differs from the folder (totoxu-crypto-analyzer)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 23 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1163 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -31 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 218: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This paid crypto-analysis skill mostly does what it says, but its billing authority is under-scoped because it includes a hardcoded fallback payment key and mismatched default skill ID.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026