SKILLEMALL.ai

AB dual-agent-solver

Run a two-agent collaborative problem-solving workflow where one agent is your OpenClaw agent (primary solver) and a second agent challenges assumptions, surfaces risks, and improves the plan over multiple rounds, then outputs one merged actionable solution and stores it in Open Brain memory.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: tvaloki v0.1.0 2 files body ≈ 217 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 75Steps. 3 steps
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 217 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 293: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 5 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
The skill’s behavior matches its description, but it intentionally uses agent/model calls, optional OpenAI access, SQL-backed Open Brain memory, and persistent storage that users should understand before use.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026