SKILLEMALL.ai

BF meta-harness-evolver

End-to-end Meta-Harness evolution for Hoss (OpenClaw agent). Runs nightly at 3 AM via OpenClaw cron. Reads Hoss's current workspace configs (SOUL.md, IDENTITY.md, AGENTS.md, TOOLS.md, MEMORY.md), proposes harness modifications via a coding-agent proposer, evaluates against a benchmark, logs results to ~/hoss-evolution/, and posts a summary to the

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Tyler v1.0.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 1 914 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process F 43/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/propose_harness.py

AnalyzerDiscordAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
43/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/propose_harness.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/propose_harness.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/propose_harness.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/propose_harness.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 100Steps. 53 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1914 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 348: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 23 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 53 items
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
  • +3All 3 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a disclosed agent-evolution automation, but it can automatically alter live agent configuration and send broader internal details to Discord than users would likely expect.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 28 May 2026