BF vipshop-img-product
唯品会(vip.com)图片搜索商品技能。当用户想通过图片搜索相似商品时触发,包括但不限于:以图搜图、拍照搜商品、图片搜索、找同款等。返回商品名称、价格、品牌、图片、链接等结构化信息。
As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: 图片URL, 商品链接
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The files contain someone else's key or token. If it is live, your agent will call third-party services under a stranger's identity; if it was revoked, the skill's scripts simply fail. Such a key often arrives with the author's whole workspace, personal data included.
The key is visible to everyone who downloaded the skill and has likely been copied by catalog-scanning bots already. Revoke it now, check bills and access logs, then reissue.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
medium Secrets in code
secret-labelled-tokenscripts/img_search.py:28Labelled token / key literal (vendor format unknown — verify it is not a live credential)API_KEY = "dafe…6b5"
-
low Secrets in code
secret-password-literalscripts/img_search.py:28Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example)API_KEY = "dafe…6b5"
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: 图片URL - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: 商品链接
Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: 图片URL, 商品链接
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (vipshop-img-product) differs from the folder (vip-img-product)
- 100Steps. 60 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1173 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 92: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 25 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 60 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.