AC volcengine-db-supabase
Manage Volcengine's AI-native BaaS platform (Supabase edition / AIDAP / 火山引擎 AI 原生 BaaS 平台 Supabase 版) — a Volcengine-operated distribution that differs from official Supabase. Use when the user asks to create, inspect, or manage Volcengine Supabase or AIDAP resources — workspaces, branches, computes, SQL queries, schema changes, Auth, Realtime, Edge Functions, Storage buckets, frontend static-site hosting (Pages), API keys, connection info, or TypeScript type generation — or when a Volcengine deployment selects AIDAP as its database provider. Also trigger on Chinese prompts mentioning "火山引擎 Supabase" or "火山 Supabase". Operations run through the byted-supabase-cli command-line tool (installed via `npm i -g @byted-supabase/cli`; this is NOT the official `supabase` CLI). Do NOT use it for general database discussions, non-Supabase services (RDS MySQL, Redis), or pure client-side coding unrelated to Supabase backend management.
Manage Volcengine's AI-native BaaS platform (Supabase edition / AIDAP / 火山引擎 AI 原生 BaaS 平台 Supabase 版) — a Volcengine-operated distribution that differs from…
As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Bash Read Write
Files scanned: 22. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 24 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 53 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3903 tokens
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (23 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +3Description length 938: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -219 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 53 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (10 of 10)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.