SKILLEMALL.ai

BC skill-refactor

技能改造方法。核心能力:评估技能是否需要存在(领域消除评估)→ 如果需要存在则重构技能内容(工作流重构)。十一步法:边界识别→存在理由分析→消除可行性评估→独立存在必要性判断→决策输出→组成部分识别→组成部分存在理由分析→补偿层消除→重整→重构验证→改造形态选择。覆盖从技能领域评估、存在必要性判断、技能内容重构到改造验证的全流程。通用方法,不绑定任何特定技能。触发词:技能改造、技能重构、技能优化、skill refactor、技能整理、技能清理、技能评估。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 波动几何 v1.0.2 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 3 042 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 13 h ago

技能改造方法。核心能力:评估技能是否需要存在(领域消除评估)→…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 89 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3042 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -235 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 230: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 89 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a markdown-only advisory method for evaluating and refactoring skills, with no code execution, credential access, persistence, or automatic changes.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 5 Jun 2026