SKILLEMALL.ai

BD Funasr-Punctuation-Restore

当用户想要**给文本恢复标点**、**ASR 转录结果加标点**、**无标点文本加标点**、**转录文本整理标点**、**批量给文件或目录加标点**时自动触发。 使用 FunASR ct-punc 模型,为一段文本、单个记事本文件(.txt)、或整个目录一键恢复中文/英文标点符号。 支持直接输入文本、单个文件路径、或整个文件夹路径(目录模式会自动在同级创建 _punctuated 镜像目录,原文件/目录不变)。 【重要约束】只处理文本标点恢复,不处理音频转录、翻译或其他 NLP 任务。 常见触发口语(越多越好): - “帮我给这段文本加标点” - “把这个转录结果恢复标点” - “ASR 文本加标点” - “这段话没有标点,帮我整理一下” - “给这个 txt 文件加标点” - “批量给文件夹里的所有文本文件加标点” - “恢复这个文本的标点符号” - “FunASR 加标点” - “把这个无标点文本变正常”

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 顶尖王牌程序员 v1.0.8 MIT-0 9 files body ≈ 254 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
65
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 11 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 254 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • -34 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 9 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 412: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 5 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill mostly performs punctuation restoration, but it also modifies Python environments and installs large or unrelated packages in ways that need careful review before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 9 Jul 2026