SKILLEMALL.ai

AC agent-privacy-check

Audit an AI agent's reachable data, external data paths, and untrusted instructions, then explain the result in plain language with Low, Medium, High, or Critical severity. Use when a user asks what an agent can see, where data may go, whether a skill, plugin, or tool is safe, or how to reduce agent privacy risk across Codex, Claude Code, or another agent.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Ward Lu v0.1.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 2 944 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 36 h ago

Audit an AI agent's reachable data, external data paths, and untrusted instructions, then explain the result in plain language with Low, Medium, High, or…

As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
61/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 12 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, git) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 33 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2944 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 358: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a read-only privacy audit guide that asks agents to map data access and egress while explicitly avoiding secret disclosure and requiring user approval for risky actions.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 10 Sept 2026