SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AC conduxt

Orchestrate full-duplex coding agent sessions via ACPX (preferred) or tmux (fallback), composing OpenClaw native tools and community Skills. Handles any coding task: requirements, bug fixes, refactoring, investigations. Use when: "implement feature X", "fix this bug", "refactor the API layer", "start agent", "open a session", "code this", "fix issue #N".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Zhouyang Xue v1.0.1 MIT-0 5 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 4 778 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, git) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4778 tokens
    • 100Steps. 22 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • low The response is described with custom markup (42 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 356: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 41 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
    • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
    • +3All 3 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This is a disclosed coding-agent orchestrator, but it can run unattended agents with broad repository permissions, so users should review it carefully before installing.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026