AD agentforge-compare
AI coding tool comparison MCP server -- compare Claude Code vs Cursor vs Windsurf vs Devin vs Copilot side-by-side with feature matrices, pricing breakdowns, and AI-powered recommendations. Use when: (1) user asks 'compare Cursor and Windsurf' or 'which AI coding tool is best', (2) user says 'tell me about Devin' or 'Copilot features', (3) user needs 'recommend an AI tool for my team of 5', (4) user asks 'how much does Cursor cost' or 'calculate AI tool costs', (5) user says 'list AI coding tools' or 'browse by category'. 15+ tools tracked, 7 comparison dimensions. Zero install, sub-100ms on Cloudflare Workers. Free + Pro $9/mo.
As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "read_when"
Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 44 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2657 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 636: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 24 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.