SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AB sharpagent-self-evolving

SharpAgent Self-Evolving Loop — An automated 'Think→Do→Learn' cycle. Fuses the Self-Improving Agent's reflection mechanism with the autoresearch experimental validation paradigm. After every task, automatically reflects on improvements, designs experiments to test hypotheses, absorbs lessons, and archives them as learning records. Makes agents smarter with use.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: yezhaowang v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 258 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentsLearningInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 18 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2258 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 363: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is a self-improvement workflow, but it can automatically persist lessons and alter future agent behavior without clear user controls.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026