SKILLEMALL.ai

BF wechat-write

公众号文案创作工具。基于红狐数据公众号爆款雷达每日收录的热门文章,按关键词检索爆款、分析流量规律、生成可发布的完整文章。当用户写公众号文章、生成公众号文案、查找爆款文章、分析爆款规律时使用。触发词:公众号文案、公众号爆款、爆款文章、公众号写作、公众号文章生成。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: to the moon v1.0.4 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 121 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: 链接

GeneratorGitHubInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
31/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: 链接
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: 链接

Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: 链接
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: 链接
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (wechat-write) differs from the folder (gzh-copywriter)
  • 100Steps. 36 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1121 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 130: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly matches its stated WeChat copywriting purpose, but it asks for sensitive personal writing samples without privacy guidance and injects an undisclosed promotional contact line from its script output.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 14 Aug 2026