SKILLEMALL.ai

BC twitter-watch-reply

使用 6551 Twitter/X 接口监控指定账号的新推文,并基于推文内容生成 AI 回复草稿;在半自动模式下,先给出候选回复,待用户确认后再通过已登录的浏览器自动回复。用于:监控某些账号、发现其新推、生成评论、人工确认后回复、避免重复回复、管理 watchlist 和状态文件。依赖环境变量 TWITTER_TOKEN 访问 6551 接口。默认把数据写到 workspace 下的 data/twitter-watch-reply;也可用 OPENCLAW_WORKSPACE 或 TWITTER_WATCH_REPLY_DATA_DIR 覆盖路径。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 0xJJbone v0.1.2 MIT-0 15 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 287 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureTelegramSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 81 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1287 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -31 of 9 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 278: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 27 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 81 items
  • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed semi-automatic Twitter/X monitoring and reply-drafting helper with expected token use, local state files, and optional outbound notifications that are disabled by default.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026