SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AC openclaw-backup

Encrypted backup and restore for OpenClaw agents. Two-tier archives: operational data safe for cloud storage, secrets encrypted with age for local recovery. Manifest verification with SHA-256 checksums. Atomic restore with staging, health checks, and auto-rollback. GitHub push with secrets protection. Daily scheduled backups. Use when setting up disaster recovery, backing up your agent, restoring from backup, or pushing archives to GitHub.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Don Zurbrick v1.1.0 MIT-0 15 files · 8 scripts body ≈ 722 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, consistency

AnalyzerGitHubAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (openclaw-backup) differs from the folder (agent-backup)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 16 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 722 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 443: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +3All 8 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This is a real backup tool, but it needs review because some workflows can upload sensitive backup material, run restored scripts, and delete old backups without enough safeguards.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026