SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AC fluentui-blazor

Guide for using the Microsoft Fluent UI Blazor component library (Microsoft.FluentUI.AspNetCore.Components NuGet package) in Blazor applications. Use this when the user is building a Blazor app with Fluent UI components, setting up the library, using FluentUI components like FluentButton, FluentDataGrid, FluentDialog, FluentToast, FluentNavMenu, FluentTextField, FluentSelect, FluentAutocomplete, FluentDesignTheme, or any component prefixed with "Fluent". Also use when troubleshooting missing providers, JS interop issues, or theming.

github/awesome-copilot Agent Skills author: github MIT 5 files body ≈ 1 723 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 12 h ago

Guide for using the Microsoft Fluent UI Blazor component library (Microsoft.FluentUI.AspNetCore.Components NuGet package) in Blazor applications. Use this…

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: GitHub Copilot / VS Code Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: RA-Skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 93): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 19 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1723 tokens
    • low The response is described with custom markup (8 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 538: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
    • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.