A github-issues
Create, update, and manage GitHub issues using MCP tools. Use this skill when users want to create bug reports, feature requests, or task issues, update existing issues, add labels/assignees/milestones, manage repository labels, set issue fields (dates, priority, custom fields), set issue types, manage issue workflows, link issues, add dependencies, or track blocked-by/blocking relationships. Triggers on requests like "create an issue", "file a bug", "request a feature", "update issue X", "set the priority", "set the start date", "create a label", "rename a label", "list repo labels", "link issues", "add dependency", "blocked by", "blocking", or any GitHub issue management task.
Create, update, and manage GitHub issues using MCP tools.
- Safety 60%
- Quality 40%
- Tests bonus
How to improve
- Add evals/evals.json with 4–6 real requests and expected answers: the full check will then use your cases instead of a model draft.
- Add a spec.yaml with triggers and assertions (skilltest init): the behaviour contract for CI.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/projects.md:139High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)... on Proj…lue { -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/projects.md:199High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)upda…lue(input: { -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/projects.md:265High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)upda…lue(input: {
Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Lint
✓ Lint: no remarks
Process maturity 55/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 16 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2116 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 13 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 687: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (10 of 10)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.