AD brain
Personal knowledge base for capturing and retrieving information about people, places, restaurants, games, tech, events, media, ideas, and organizations. Use when: user mentions a person, place, restaurant, landmark, game, device, event, book/show, idea, or company. Trigger phrases: "remember", "note that", "met this person", "visited", "played", "what do I know about", etc. Brain entries take precedence over daily logs for named entities.
Personal knowledge base for capturing and retrieving information about people, places, restaurants, games, tech, events, media, ideas, and organizations.
As a process D 38/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "setup" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "permissions"
Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 11 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (brain) differs from the folder (2nd-brain)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 85Steps. 59 steps, 3 vague phrases
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2594 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 443: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 24 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 59 items
- +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.