BD Claw Security Scanner
基于Moltbook社区的高度关注(4151点赞的帖子:供应链攻击风险),我们开发了这个技能安全扫描器。
基于Moltbook社区的高度关注(4151点赞的帖子:供应链攻击风险),我们开发了这个技能安全扫描器。
As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
ProcedureSoftware developmentData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 6
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 6
-
low Secrets in code
secret-labelled-tokentest_security_scanner.py:27Labelled token / key literal (vendor format unknown — verify it is not a live credential) (placeholder value)API_KEY = "sk_t…def"
placeholder -
low Secrets in code
secret-password-literaltest_security_scanner.py:27Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example) (placeholder value)API_KEY = "sk_t…def"
placeholder -
low Secrets in code
secret-aws-keytest_security_scanner.py:30AWS access key ID (placeholder value)AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID = "AKIA…PLE"
placeholder -
low Secrets in code
secret-password-literaltest_security_scanner.py:66Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example) (test fixture / example file; quoted — discussed, not commanded)SECRET_KEY=supe…123
fixturequoted -
low Secrets in code
secret-labelled-tokentest_security_scanner.py:100Labelled token / key literal (vendor format unknown — verify it is not a live credential) (placeholder value)API_KEY = "sk_t…def"
placeholder -
low Secrets in code
secret-password-literaltest_security_scanner.py:100Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example) (placeholder value)API_KEY = "sk_t…def"
placeholder
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Claw Security Scanner) differs from the folder (claw-security-scanner)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 116 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1456 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 52: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -221 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 57 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 116 items
- +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 62.