AF gemini-sub-agent
Use Google Gemini as a free sub-agent via a Google One / Gemini Advanced subscription (no API key or API credits needed). Use when: (1) delegating tasks that would normally cost Sonnet/Haiku credits, (2) processing large documents or long-context tasks (1M token window), (3) running agentic coding tasks autonomously, (4) any text analysis, summarization, or Q&A task. Replaces paid cloud models for medium-complexity tasks. NOT for: tasks needing OpenClaw-native tools (web_search, sessions_spawn, Telegram), real-time data, or tasks requiring OpenClaw context.
Use Google Gemini as a free sub-agent via a Google One / Gemini Advanced subscription (no API key or API credits needed).
As a process F 46/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/ask-gemini
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/ask-gemini
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/ask-gemini
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 100Steps. 6 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 684 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 563: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.