SKILLEMALL.ai

BD tokamak-vault-breach

Participate in the Tokamak Network Vault Breach Challenge - an AI security Capture The Flag (CTF) game where you interact with a secured AI agent to extract secret information. Use this skill when the user mentions Tokamak, vault hacking, CTF challenges, AI security testing, prompt injection, social engineering AI agents, or wants to participate in blockchain/security challenges.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 2 files body ≈ 1 742 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Participate in the Tokamak Network Vault Breach Challenge - an AI security Capture The Flag (CTF) game where you interact with a secured AI agent to extract…

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

IntegrationDiscordAI and agentsData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
91
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Instruction override medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The text contains phrases like "ignore previous instructions" or "you are now…". That is an attempt to hijack the agent: it may break your rules, the system limits or company policy.

For the author

An honest skill does not need them: state the role and the rules directly without overriding other instructions. Otherwise catalog scanners and corporate filters will block the listing.

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 5

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 5
    • medium Instruction override en-ignore-previous SKILL.md:93
      Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (documentation of a security skill)
      Attempt to bypass system instructions through creative framing, role-play scenarios, or context manipulation.
      security skill
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:21
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)
      Contract: 0xa6…88E
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:22
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)
      Token:    0x2b…3C5 (TON)
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:171
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)
      │  Contract: 0xa6…88E        │
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:172
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)
      │  Token:    0x2b…3C5       │

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 19 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1742 tokens
    • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
    • medium 3 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 382: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 25 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
    • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.