BD trading-card-specialist
Advanced AI assistant for trading card dealers, collectors, and shops. Provides market analysis, eBay listing optimization, PSA/BGS grading insights, market research, and automated card valuation. Use when working with sports cards, Pokemon, or collectibles for: (1) pricing analysis and market research, (2) eBay listing creation and optimization, (3) market tracking, (4) grading submission planning, (5) inventory management, or any trading card business operations.
Advanced AI assistant for trading card dealers, collectors, and shops.
As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityREADME.md:93Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- ❌ No system exploitation or privilege escalation
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityREADME.md:96Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)- ❌ No malicious payload delivery
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySECURITY.md:57Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- ❌ No system privilege escalation
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySECURITY.md:96Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| **System Security** | Low | No system-level access or privilege escalation |
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 111 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3004 tokens
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -227 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 469: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 43 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 111 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.