B github-cli
Comprehensive GitHub CLI (gh) reference. Covers repos, issues, PRs, Actions, releases, gists, search, projects v2, API, secrets/variables, labels, codespaces, extensions, auth, and advanced GraphQL patterns.
IntegrationGitHubSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
B
87/100
Overall score
- Safety 60%
- Quality 40%
- Tests bonus
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body exceeds 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it on demand.
- Add evals/evals.json with 4–6 real requests and expected answers: the full check will then use your cases instead of a model draft.
- Add a spec.yaml with triggers and assertions (skilltest init): the behaviour contract for CI.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:1084High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)upda…lue(input: { -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:1123High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)conv…sue(input: { -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:1154High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (placeholder value)... on Proj…lue { number field { ... on Proj…eld { name } } }placeholder -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:1156High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (placeholder value)... on Proj…lue { name field { ... on Proj…eld { name } } }placeholder -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:1157High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (placeholder value)... on Proj…lue { title field { ... on Proj…eld { name } } }placeholder
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Lint
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 11017 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process maturity 40/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 22 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 11017 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 35 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- low 22 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (12 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 207: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 113 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
- +4Has examples (92 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This is a documentation-only GitHub CLI reference whose powerful examples are expected for the tool but require care with tokens, secrets, extensions, and destructive commands.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026