BF ui-design-toolkit
(no description)
1. 确认运行环境满足依赖说明中的要求 2. 在AI Agent对话中调用本技能,提供必要的输入参数
As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/style.md, assets/output.json
How to improve
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Missing , or : between flow sequence items at line 10, column 17: description: [''创意设计领域的专业化AI辅助工具'']。"设计清晰一致视觉精致的用户界面。Design clear, consistent, … ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 204 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/style.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: assets/output.json - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary_zh" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "tools" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100
Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/style.md, assets/output.json
- 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/style.md, assets/output.json
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 100Steps. 61 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2266 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 25 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 47 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 61 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 54.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This UI design skill is mostly a design guide, but it asks for broad read, write, and command-execution authority that is not clearly scoped to UI work.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · 15 Aug 2026