SKILLEMALL.ai

AD skill-publisher

Create, validate, security-scan, and publish skills to ClawHub. Use when asked to "make a skill", "publish a skill", "create a new skill", "scaffold a skill", "package this as a skill", or any request to build and distribute agent capabilities.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Ash Bhat v1.0.0 7 files · 4 scripts body ≈ 564 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
39/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege scripts/security-scan.sh:88
      Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (code comment; documentation of a security skill)
      # 6. File permissions - check for setuid/setgid (4xxx, 2xxx) which are dangerous
      commentsecurity skill
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege scripts/security-scan.sh:91
      Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (code comment; documentation of a security skill)
      # Only flag setuid (4xxx), setgid (2xxx), or world-writable (xx7)
      commentsecurity skill

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (skill-publisher) differs from the folder (skillpub)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 16 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 564 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 244: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
    • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
    • +3All 4 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill has a legitimate publishing purpose, but its publishing script appears to allow command injection and includes easy bypasses for validation and security checks.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026